The Assembly of the Republic has rejected two bills aimed at extending labelling to new products for food containing GMO’s and providing information to consumers on the environmental cost of food production.
The first bill was presented by Mariana Silva, of the greens, who argued that "any citizen has the right to make their choices fully and consciously" and that the party remains committed "to combating the cultivation of genetically modified products. The manipulation is an incongruity and a danger, because agriculture is practiced in open fields and not in the laboratory”, she stressed.
However, the proposal only received the acceptance of PCP and BE and abstention from the Liberal Initiative (IL), with PS, PSD, CDS-PP and Chega voting against.
In discussing the bill, social democrat João Loura criticized the return of a “discussion that has already taken place and that has already been rejected”, without failing to point out “incongruences” to the document. For the PSD deputy, the current obligation to provide information on GMOs above 0.9% is sufficient, while noting that imposing the obligation beyond this threshold "is very difficult for science" and that it would "make life difficult for Portuguese farmers".
The criticism was shared by Cecília Meireles, from the CDS-PP, with the centrist deputy considering that the project contains an “ideological prejudice in relation to some products”. Socialist deputy Palmira Maciel, on the other hand, observed only that "the concerns that are at the base of this initiative must be properly framed in the context of national policy."
In the opposite direction, the Left Bloc, through deputy Nelson Peralta, accused the large parties of “subservience” to multinationals in the agrochemical industry, while the PCP classified the proposal as “balanced”. According to communist João Dias, “the big bet must be on small and medium-sized agriculture, which produces safe and quality products” for national consumers.
As for the bill submitted by the PAN and made known in parliament by Bebiana Cunha, the deputy recalled that the "food sector is one of those with the greatest environmental impact" worldwide and that, often, information about its origin and the environmental costs of products is reduced or hidden from the public.
The argument did not convince the other parties, with PS, PSD, PCP, CDS-PP, Chega and IL rejecting the text.
Small and medium size agriculture should be protected mostly by promoting it close to or within major urban centres to offer choice and alternative organically grown products to urban consumers. This would enable them to successfully compete with large agricultural enterprises that, when or if allowed, would totally swallow them to achieve full control of food markets, consumers and prices. But that's a far cry from imposing additional and unreasonable restrictions like additional labelling on genetically modified foods! Both are needed and indispensable in our world of rich and poor societies! But the PAN/BE argument that small and medium size agriculture produces cheaper food is not true, often flawed or even falacious. A healthier way out of the polemic is to further promote "farmers markets" or, in Portugal, the tradicional "feiras" within all urban centres! That would allow small agriculture to survive and to some extent rein on the insatiable lust of the major agro-business by producing green products! The PAN argument also has real merit on what relates to the environmental degradation created almost everywhere by the poorly regulated big agro-business! We all see it across the World (USA, Canada, Brasil, Indonesia, Borneo, etc.) where the natural habitat has been totally destroyed at an unacceptable and even criminal rate for the sake maximizing profits by larger agricultural companies!
By Tony Fernandes from Other on 03 Oct 2021, 13:26
What kind of people deliberately hold back information from consumers?
Tricksters, con men, liars and thieves?
Welcome to Tortugal
By Joe from Alentejo on 05 Oct 2021, 05:23
In response to Joe - the same people who deny regular citizens and people the right to decent housing. The housing market in Portugal is only for the very rich and for temporary tourists. An "annual "rent is 5-6 months. Really? Can't people count in Portugal? (annual usually means 12 months in the rest of the world) .
By K from Algarve on 06 Oct 2021, 16:52