“Today, in Portugal, we are breaking a historic record”, said the demography specialist, referring to data records obtained since 1911.
“We've never had such a low number of births in Portugal,” she stressed.
The “heel prick test” that covers almost all births in Portugal tracked less than 80,000 babies in 2021, for the first time in the country, according to data by the Ricardo Jorge National Institute of Health (INSA).
“This has to do with the year in which the babies were conceived”, said Maria João Valente Rosa, associating the drop in births with the Covid-19 pandemic.
“They were children conceived in the middle of a pandemic”, said the professor at the Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
The uncertainty associated with the crisis caused by the pandemic, in terms of work, but also in terms of health, the fear of contracting Covid, of not having adequate medical care, the problems with visits to hospitals and in the monitoring of deliveries, weighed heavily on the decision to have a child according to the demographer.
“We have to understand this data in light of the pandemic. Births were already dropping a lot, but we've never had such low values,” she said.
According to the expert, many parents will have postponed the decision to have a child. As the average age of maternity is already very high (over 30 years old) and the childbearing age of a woman is between 15 and 50 years old, in statistical terms, delayed births can result in “missed births”.
“This period was marked by highly difficult situations. Portugal has never recorded such low values in its history”, underlined Maria João Valente Rosa.
Last year, 79,217 newborns were studied under the National Neonatal Screening Program (PNRN), 6,239 fewer than in 2020 (85,456).
According to the expert, the drop in the number of births associated with the increase in the number of deaths will make Portugal close the year with an "extremely negative" natural population balance.
I am about to give birth in a couple of weeks and I've never felt so scared and alone. It will be our first child and my partner hasn't been able to come with me during any of the scans. The Public health system for scans etc was impossible to utilise. They kept using the excuse of a delay due to lockdowns but funny enough when using the expensive private hospitals to do the scans, I could get in straight away. So I can understand why people choose not to have a baby in those times. The public health system likes to claim that they offer all of this for free but in reality, unless you have the money to pay for private scans, you will have a miserable pregnancy spending everyday of your pregnancy trying to book for a scan and being told to call the next day. Even in a pandemic, the public health care system should priorities important time related things such as pregnancy, cancer etc...
By Marie from Algarve on 24 Jan 2022, 08:22
We humans are already the principal driver of climate change, the extinction of other species, the pollution of land, sea and air, and the cause of deforestation and desertification of the soil and we are increasing in number worldwide at the rate of 10,000 an hour.
During the 13 days of COP26 the we needed to find extra food, clean water, energy for an additional 2.8 million people, (births minus deaths). Did any of the delegates mention this? Did anyone suggest that reducing our numbers is the way to secure the safety and sustainability of future generations?
The good news is that many countries now have a reducing ‘total fertility rate’; this is good news for the future and when it leads to reducing our numbers isn’t it positively the way to go?
By Richard P Beauchamp from UK on 25 Jan 2022, 16:56
Marie in Algarve, I hope the birth of your baby goes very well and all the best to you and your new family.
By Lisa from Other on 25 Jan 2022, 22:04