The old method for cleaning a rug was to
hang it up and beat the bejesus out of it with a carpet beater. Carpet
sweepers, pushed along by manual means to clean up debris were next. The
technology to make an electric cleaner took a little longer to come about, and
in 1901, Englishman Hubert Cecil Booth patented the vacuum in the UK –
or an early version of it.
His machine, the ‘Puffing Billy’, had a
5 hp piston pump driven by a petrol/gasoline engine or electric motor. It was a
huge beast pulled by a horse from place to place and was rolled out for those
that could afford it, as a visit wasn’t cheap—the cost equaled the annual wages
of a 'tweeny', a junior domestic maid.
Locals outside were encouraged to marvel
at the amount of dirt collected through a special glass chamber on the side of
the machine—a cunning marketing strategy. After a round of court cases, brought
about because of the disruption the machine caused on the streets (including
frightening horses) and from a series of disgruntled inventors, Booth finally
convinced the courts that his machine was the only vacuum cleaner at the time
that actually worked.
When a customer’s home or business
needed cleaning, a Puffing Billy was parked outside and a team of workers
lugged hoses in through the doors and windows, and although this had obvious
commercial applications, it probably didn’t make the life of the average
householder any simpler.
Booth was an engineer and had set off on
a mission to produce a machine that would suck, not blow. Apparently, after
some alleged near-fatal tests—in which he nearly choked after putting a handkerchief
'filter' over his mouth and sucking up dust from the arm of a chair— he formed
the British Vacuum Cleaner Company and launched his new device.
Such was his success that he was called
upon to perform a number of unusual jobs–like cleaning the girders of Crystal
Palace, which were suffering from accumulated dust, where 15 of his machines
were used to remove literally tons of dust from the building.
But earlier in 1899, across’ the pond’,
an American named John S. Thurman patented the first (and only)
‘pneumatic carpet-renovator’. Although he’s sometimes credited with the
invention of the vacuum, his machine really did the opposite - it dislodged
dust from carpets by blasting them with jets of compressed air, with the dust
being blown into a receptacle rather than being sucked in.
The one who succeeded had a personal
stake in the vacuum - James Murray Spangler, another American - who
worked as a department store caretaker and invented things on the side. He had
asthma, not good for his job of cleaning a dusty department store, and it is
said that he made his own vacuum cleaner from a tin soap box, a sateen
pillowcase as a dust collector, and a broom handle. Inside the box, he had an
electric motor from a sewing machine which powered a fan and a rotating brush.
The crudely-made machine collected dirt and blew it into the pillowcase, and he
called it ‘the suction sweeper’.
His cousin Susan Hoover (yes, that
Hoover) also thought it was a good idea and told her husband, industrialist William
Hoover, who bought into the idea in 1908, and the rest is history. His
invention proved to be arguably the first truly practicable domestic vacuum
cleaner.
More recently James Dyson invented
the first bagless vacuum cleaner, after finding his vacuum’s bag was failing
because of clogged dust. He took the machine apart, and after five years of
trial and error, he invented the world’s first bagless vacuum cleaner in 1983.
The model was first sold in Japan and, with the money he earned from sales, he
launched his own company, Dyson Ltd., in the UK in 1991. Now a household name,
Dyson has since expanded its product line to include fans, heaters, air
purifiers, hair dryers, and hand dryers.
So, will all today’s smart appliances
and gadgets finally give us that long-promised future of R & R? Only time
will tell!
Marilyn writes regularly for The Portugal News, and has lived in the Algarve for some years. A dog-lover, she has lived in Ireland, UK, Bermuda and the Isle of Man.
The greatest difference in results between using a broom and a vacuum cleaner is the broom stirs more dust than vacuum during cleaning. VC is my friend-the bag fills well, so there´s lots to clean regularly- even though the people representing it locally are not (NILFISK). How can anyone make maintenance of the apparatus-which can last my whole life w/out ruining because it has maintenance implied- if the people supposed to do that locally swindle costumers? It defeats the whole purpose of the brand- to not have to change VC during your whole life, more environmentally friendly-which is a shame. Not even a great product can survive the dishonest/purposely incompetent local representatives.
By guida from Lisbon on 17 Sep 2022, 05:54