The data is highlighted by the Portuguese environmental association Zero, which highlights that if every person on the planet lived like an average Portuguese person, humanity would require around 2.9 planets to sustain its use of resources.
But the association also states that Portugal delayed the day on which it starts using more resources than it should have by three weeks, as last year it exhausted the resources on May 7th.
However, explains Zero, the decline in the impact of the ecological footprint compared to 2023 results from the fact that some of the variables used to calculate consumption are related to 2020 and in that year the covid-19 pandemic led to a widespread halt in economic activity.
Zero highlights in a statement that Portugal has been lacking for many years in the capacity to provide the natural resources necessary for the activities carried out (production and consumption). But it highlights a positive trend towards a small reduction in “environmental debt”.
Food consumption (30% of the country's global footprint) and mobility (18%) are, according to Zero, among the activities that contribute most to Portugal's ecological footprint.
The association suggests measures to improve the situation, such as focusing on agriculture that gives preference to quality food, preserving soil, reducing pollution and water use, and enhancing ecosystems.
The Ecological Footprint assesses human needs for renewable resources and essential services and compares them with the Earth's capacity to provide such resources and services (biocapacity).
In the calculation to determine the day of the planet's overload, the “Global Footprint Network” placed the European Union in exhausting the resources allocated to it on May 3rd.
But the country that first exhausted its resources was Qatar, on February 11th, followed by Luxembourg, on the 20th, the United Arab Emirates, on March 4th, and the United States, on March 14th.
The last countries to exhaust their resources will be Ecuador and Indonesia, on November 24th, Iraq on the 15th, and Jamaica on the 12th.
Complete and utter hysterical nonsense aimed at the lowest common denominator of human intelligence, you will believe anything they're told, no matter how cretinous, illogical, unproven and absurd, and who are currently queuing to get their 9th safe and effective thingie. Pathetic.
By Hart from Lisbon on 28 May 2024, 11:22
Then Portugal should stop increasing its population and restrict its tourism and also people living in cities should be told to make an extra effort to reduce their footprint .
By Paul Graham RICE from Beiras on 29 May 2024, 01:52
What can an average person do to improve these numbers? The whole topic is a bit overwhelming and creates emotional responses that completely dismiss the topic. This is how humans deal with information they have no control over. We ignore the entire thing and disparage the facts, ridicule real science and make things worse. I'm willing, what can I do?
By MICHAEL A MORRIS from USA on 29 May 2024, 04:23
I thought this was something serious, like how the EU is unhappy with Portugal for not following some guidelines, not some made up environmentalist BS.
By Leonardo from Lisbon on 29 May 2024, 07:46
Interesting
comment Hart from Lisbon. And what is your best estimate of when the Earth's 8 billion auto driving, airplane flying, fossil fuel consuming people will exceed Mother Earth's ability to support us?
By Terry from Other on 29 May 2024, 10:03
"Global Footprint Network" are another privately run organisation with their own agenda. Why do these groups get so such airtime?
By Winston Thomas from Algarve on 29 May 2024, 10:17
Meanwhile, Mr. Gates and the WEF goons are jetting around the world, impervious to any restrictions on their waste, fraud and abuse.
By MimiB from Lisbon on 29 May 2024, 11:13
Before we get excited, please explain what resources they are referring to?
By Homm from Lisbon on 29 May 2024, 13:31
We probably need to have a look at the companies that are contributing to this:
"The Carbon Majors Database report that 100 companies are responsible for 71% of green house gas emissions and the following 10 companies are those which belch most carbon dioxide into the atmosphere:
China Coal 14.3 %
Saudi Aramco 4.5 %
Gazprom OAO 3.9 %
National Iranian Oil Co 2.3 %
ExxonMobil Corp 2.0 %
Coal India 1.9 %
Petróleos Mexicanos 1.9 %
Russia Coal 1.9 %
Royal Dutch Shell PLC 1.7 %
China National Petroleum Corp 1.6 %"
It makes no difference what the individual does if they continue this. Which, I am hazarding a guess at, they will. Because they will lobby and payoff corrupt governments all over the world to do so.
As such, I'd kick back, have a glass of wine and enjoy the sunshine!
By RossC from Lisbon on 29 May 2024, 17:11