Data released by the community statistical office on the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on the EU economy reveal that, in the third quarter of 2023, these emissions fell in 23 European countries, compared to the same period in 2022.
Of these 23 EU member states that are estimated to have reduced their emissions, Portugal and 10 others (Romania, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Belgium, Spain, Slovenia, Poland, France and Lithuania) managed to “reduce emissions while increasing their GDP”, according to Eurostat.
Another 11 (Ireland, Estonia, Austria, Luxembourg, Sweden, Finland, Czechia, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Hungary) recorded declines in their GDP, while Italy maintained a stable economy.
Still by country, the biggest reductions in pollutant emissions recorded in the third quarter of 2023 compared to the same period last year were seen in Estonia (-30.7%), Bulgaria (-18.6%) and Germany (-12.2% ), while the biggest increases occurred in Malta (+7.7%), Cyprus (+3.7%) and Latvia (+3.4%).
In the EU as a whole, in the third quarter of 2023, Eurostat estimates that greenhouse gas emissions will have stood at 787 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, a decrease of 7.1% compared to the same quarter of 2022.
For its part, GDP recorded a slight decline of 0.2% in the third quarter of 2023, compared to the same period in 2022.
By economic sectors, the greatest reductions in pollutant emissions were seen, in the third quarter of 2023 compared to the same period in 2022, in the supply of electricity and gas (-23.7%), in households (-6.5%) and in the manufacturing industry (-4.9%).
It is a great effort made, decreasing emissions while maintaining GDP and production. A long way to go for us to start cheering; but it does show it can be done, as an example to the climate nay-sayers (and big oil / gas companies).
By Anthony Williams from Other on 14 Feb 2024, 19:25
Quote: "By economic sectors, the greatest reductions in pollutant emissions were seen, in the third quarter of 2023 compared to the same period in 2022, in the supply of electricity and gas (-23.7%), in households (-6.5%) and in the manufacturing industry (-4.9%)."
So - less industrial output leads to less emissions - is that good for the workers and their families, and people that provide goods and services for them?
A decrease os 6.5% in household emissions - it's not because extra efficiency - its because people salaries and pensions make them use less AC and less heating (be it electric or gas).
The PIB increase is because of tourism.
People are worse of and that's no reason to celebrate.
An article yesterday says prostitution has been increasing, I wonder why? - Lack of money and "turism business opportunity".
As for reductions in agriculture:
Soon we will be eating South American vegetables and with larger amount of pesticides and even banned ones, and beef with larger amount of antibiotics, if not prions.
When the war starts and shipping stops due to submarine activity, there will be rationing and hunger in Europe.
Even today, when school is closed due to teacher strike or lockdown, a significant portion if kids don't eat. They have nothing resembling a meal at home.
Keep going - 50% CO2 reduction and whatever Methane means hunger for the working poor.
By Goncalo Pacheco from Alentejo on 15 Feb 2024, 11:40