“As an example of what happens in the agricultural sector, where there is an allocation per area, we suggest considering the use of the same rationale for urban consumption, with the implementation of an allocation per inhabitant - as occurs in Egypt, for example”, says the entity in a letter sent to the working group.
Macário Correia, president of the Sotavento Algarvio Regantes Association and one of the founding members of the federation, created in August last year, considered, in statements to Lusa, that this is “a question of justice”.
“It makes no sense for restrictions to be for some and not for others, and it makes no sense to have allocations for agriculture and not for other sectors”, he explains.
While in agriculture there are allocations per crop and per unit of area, referenced in the titles for the use of underground water resources or in the titles for surface water, “in urban consumption there is no restriction of this kind”, adds the director.
“It is something that becomes necessary because there is unruly urban consumption, which is not careful about efficiency and savings”, highlighted Macário Correia, adding that some Algarve councils, “last summer, wasted water”, namely with the irrigation of “sidewalks, asphalt and roundabouts”.
The allocation would be defined “depending” on the population and hotel capacity existing in each municipality, explained the former mayor of Faro and Tavira.
“A city hall has so many inhabitants and so many hotel beds. There should be an allocation defined based on this consumption need. Just look at the average consumption of those [municipalities] that have more efficient management and table them there”, he explained.
In the letter sent to the “Water that Unites” working group, Fedagri recalls that the World Health Organization “argues that 110 litres/day are sufficient to meet a person's basic consumption and hygiene needs”.
In Portugal, “various sources of information point to an average value of 190 litres/day per person”, and, in the Algarve, according to the APA, “consumption by tourists is greater than 300 litres/day”, the document reads.
The federation maintains that Algarve agriculture “has been adapting” to the meteorological drought situation that the Algarve has been experiencing since 2012 and that it has made investments “that resulted in a 50% reduction in water consumption” compared to 2002 values.
Fines
Among the other demands presented to the working group, Fedagri points out “the existence of fines for municipalities that continue to present water losses above what is reasonable”, indicating that, according to APA data from the end of 2023, water losses in municipal networks “represented 30 hm3 [cubic hectometres] of water every year”.
The increase in water storage capacity, more correct management of the Algarve's aquifers, the increase in the volume of treated wastewater, and the strengthening of awareness among the population and the desalination plant are the other points addressed by the Algarve Farmers' Federation.
The “Water that Unites” initiative, which should be presented in January, aims to define the country's strategy for the efficient management, storage and distribution of water.
Nice idea, but this won't happen. The money that tourism brings in will outweigh money from agriculture. Parts of the Algarve is already over developed in terms of agriculture with new farms and nurseries continuously being added to the landscape. Often funded by the EU, owned by non Portuguese companies and authorized by local authorities and politicians ( some might say dubiously).
The tourism sector brings in far more money. Admittedly they can and should do more. The are many management companies of villas that will change the water in hot tubs with every new arrival. A typical 5 person hot tub has approx 1850 litres of water! The money that the golden triangle brings in plus large tourist hubs is very important to the economy. Who would want to buy a €5 million ( or more) property in a dust bowl?
The solutions are there for the making. Less agriculture and less tourism. Maybe a larger proportion of council and tourist tax to be spent on water infrastructure repairs and new water infrastructure.
By David Clark from Algarve on 07 Jan 2025, 06:33
And yet there are continually new and ever increasing Avo fields everywhere around Tavira etc. I assume they all require lots of water!
By simon Adrians from UK on 07 Jan 2025, 10:46
Has the agriculture sector taken responsibility?!? Sorry but that’s NOT correct at all… as especially the avocado plantations has been spread around everywhere in Algarve. These has started during the drought in the last 3-5 years and should/must be stopped to save Algarve until the water situation is solved. And that’s immeadetely. It’s just crazy how these can be allowed.
By Martin from Algarve on 07 Jan 2025, 12:07
This is really the pot calling the kettle black; agriculture water supply cost around 5 cents per ton, domestic users are paying on a sliding scale that rises after just a few tons per month, upto 100x more than agriculture users.
The domestic charge is per connection, not per person; so a household of 6 has the same charge scale as a single person household.
This is grossly unfair, and punishes the poor at the expense of the rich.
Agriculture, still using 90% of available water, with no restrictions on ground extraction, will soon deplete our precious aquifers.
We all love our farmers; but we need to get real. Agriculture requires rainfall.
Blaming domestic users is the epitome of hypocrisy.
By mark Holden from Algarve on 07 Jan 2025, 12:09
What dystopian hell is this? The moment the Agroindustrial lobby pays the same for a cubic meter of water as individuals in the domestic sector, they can complain. It's about time citizens stop seeing the agroindustrial sector as the neighborly farmer. They are far from it. They have their large share of responsibility on the environmental collapse we are suffering and overuse too much of everyone's resources
By Nunof from Lisbon on 07 Jan 2025, 15:03
This is an important, if not essential, option for adoption as soon as possible, and has been practiced in other countries/cities. My wife and I have previously experienced the requirement to limit our water consumption to 50 litres/day and were reasonably able to achieve this target. The process applied by the city was a broad-stroke measure, managed through steep increase in price above the nominal monthly household allocation. Admittedly, voluntary compliance by consumers with the requirements of the city was more significant than it is in the Algarve, as was the effort made by the authorities and businesses (including tourism and tourists) to conserve water. We Agarvians are too water wasteful - come on folks, let's make an effort.
By Martin Richards from Algarve on 08 Jan 2025, 13:22
Most of us are spoilt and haven't yet experienced just what it is like, not to have water.
By Martin Richards from Algarve on 08 Jan 2025, 13:28