In the Program of the XXIV Constitutional Government, presented today in the Assembly of the Republic, what was promised by the Democratic Alliance (PSD/CDS-PP/PPM) when it ran for the most recent legislative elections, in March, is fulfilled and the “determination ” to revoke some decisions of the previous socialist executive, translated into Law No. 56/2023, approved on October 6 last year.
Local accommodation
With regard to local accommodation, the Government Program indicates that the extraordinary contribution on this activity and the expiration of licenses prior to the Mais Habitação program will be revoked “immediately”.
The executive also adds that it will review “other legal limitations” on local accommodation “considered disproportionate”, without mentioning what it will do in relation to the suspension of the registration of new local accommodation outside low-density territories.
The previous socialist executive approved the forced leasing of houses abandoned for more than two years, a measure that the PSD/CDS-PP Government will revoke, opposing the “almost automatic injection into the market of vacant or underused properties and public land”.
Rent freezes
At the same time, the Government (PSD/CDS-PP) drops rent freezes and replaces them with "subsidies for vulnerable tenants", justifying: “We do not believe that the response to the housing crisis involves administrative price control, by freezing income or by limiting it within very strict bands, ignoring the rules in force, for everyone.”
According to the document, housing policy will be based on five axes, with the first focusing on increasing supply (private, public and cooperative), within which a program of public-private partnerships is proposed to “ large-scale construction and rehabilitation of both general housing and student accommodation”.
The second axis is based on the observation that it is necessary to promote “stability and confidence” in the rental market and includes measures such as “review and acceleration of mechanisms for rapid dispute resolution in the event of non-compliance with contracts”.
Thirdly, the Government maintains support for “vulnerable tenants”, aware that “the commitment to increasing the supply of private and public housing takes time”.
However, it is proposed to do so “through the subsidizing of tenants who need it and not the widespread punishment of owners”, criticizing “the ideological focus” of the PS “on restrictive measures that limit and collide with the right to property, which place some against others, which limit private economic initiative” and which “leave the State alone and unable to guarantee a boost to the housing market”.
Thus, the Government will replace the “administrative price limitations” with “public subsidy to tenants in situations of vulnerability/effective need (measured according to the rate of effort and level of income)” and grant reimbursement “starting with families with the highest rates of effort.”
Market imbalance
The Government finds justification for a public policy that “helps” the “many current and prospective tenants experiencing great difficulties” in the current “period of market imbalance”, explaining that it intends to expand the range of contracts covered by the subsidy (currently limited to 15 March 2023 – the year that, in the program, appears incorrectly as 2022).
At the same time, and “while the market does not stabilize”, it will maintain a “dynamic income subsidy” that covers families with high effort rates, highlighting that the Tax Authority will check contracts frequently.
The fourth axis consists of support for young people to purchase their first home, through tax exemption and a public guarantee to enable bank financing of the entire price.
Revoking the “wrong measures” of the Mais Habitação program, approved in October with only favorable votes from the PS, is the indication of the fifth axis of “reforms to resolve the crisis”.
The Program of the XXIV Constitutional Government was delivered today by the Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, Pedro Duarte, to the President of the Assembly of the Republic, José Pedro Aguiar-Branco.
Dynamic income subsidy sounds good. My only question is how about the many tenants without a rental contract? Or are the landlords punished enough by not paying their taxes?
By Lior from Lisbon on 11 Apr 2024, 11:46
Well done! Down with the failed and bankrupt Socialist ideology that sees everything as a 'right' that the taxpayer has to subsidise or provide free. No-one owes you anything. Each person is responsible for the outcome in their lives.
High house prices, or expensive rents? Move to a more affordable area, work longer hours, or study for a better job/career. We shouldn't be punishing or holding back the successful just because the market doesn't always provide for a few marginal cases.
By Billy Bissett from Porto on 11 Apr 2024, 13:37
@BillY Bissett I have been reading your comments for the last couple of years here and this last one really irked me and hence I had to chime in. You sound like a very entitled and ignorant foreigner on the issues here in Portugal. The solution is not as simple as how you describe it. The system of low wages in Portugal has always pegged the families and workers back and now even more so in this inflationary environment worsened by rapidly rising house/rent prices. People are stuck. Do you understand this?? Perhaps it is you that should move back to wherever you came from instead of coming on this site to constantly whine about the locals whining on their difficult housing situation. Have some compassion and at least stop complaining....or move back to your country!
By Manuel Branco from Lisbon on 11 Apr 2024, 19:27
I did rent to all but after the first 2 Portuguese tenants never rented again. The first one ripped up the tenant agreement, l had just renovated the house and they
never cleaned it in the two years they were there, they only paid the first months rent
I went home for a month and while away they cut down fruit trees for wood even tho there was cut wood left to use. The GNR never helped altho l explained the time it took to take them to court plus the cost for someone who did,nt have money to pay the rent even tho they were working seemed a waste of money on my part.In the end l noticed them stealing water and when l checked their meter he had taken the water meter away and attached a piece of garden hose straight to the supply. The GNR came and that nite they left. The water company then tried to get me to pay all bills (€1 000) and would,nt connect a supply in my name to me until it was paid. I refused
to pay and for near on a year l had no water to clean and restore the house. In the end l asked a friend whose brother l found out worked for the water company before he died if she would come to the water company with me. When the same girl who kept telling me l had to pay first before the supply was connected saw my friend and realized she was with me suddenly l did,nt need to pay anymore. Surprise surprise. People in public jobs are in my book mostly think they are above the law.l have even had one who stole off me.
The other tenant was even so dreadful in that she never ever threw out her babies nappies and left them in a corner to pile up for months and that,s not even the worse of it. I wo,nt entertain you with her horror
story but suffice to say, firstly the best tenants are people who have had own home
By Haris from Lisbon on 12 Apr 2024, 14:30