The Portuguese Airlines Association (RENA) which represents airlines has criticised ANA's plans to raise fees starting in 2026 to pre-finance the development of the new infrastructure at the Campo de Tiro de Alcochete.
As the regulated rates at Humberto Delgado will rise by about 50% from 2026 to 2030 compared to current levels, the ANA's current proposal will ultimately have an impact on the state's future revenue from national airports.
Lisbon’s airport changing position in airport fee rankings
Historically, Lisbon was one of the most affordable airports in Europe. A graph from ANA's Initial Report on the new airport reveals that Lisbon ranked as the second cheapest in 2019 among 20 comparable European airports, just ahead of Rome-Ciampino.
However, in 2024, the airport climbed to the seventh most expensive, surpassing major hubs such as Madrid, Barcelona, Stockholm, and Dublin. With the proposed fee increases, Lisbon is projected to become the 11th most expensive airport by 2030, surpassing even Paris Charles de Gaulle, Geneva and Copenhagen.
RENA disapproves proposed increases
RENA’s executive director, António Moura Portugal, has criticised the proposed increases, emphasising that airlines already face high costs at Humberto Delgado Airport. The association has stated its intention to closely monitor the process and present its position at the appropriate time.
As António Moura Portugal shared “The Portuguese Airlines Association (RENA) has taken note of ANA’s proposal and the response from the grantor, the Portuguese State. This process will evolve and RENA will take its position at the appropriate time”.
ANA, however, argues that the proposed fee increase is necessary for funding the new airport, which carries an estimated cost of €8.5 billion. To ensure profitability, ANA also suggests removing an agreement that limits airport charges to no more than 15% above the median of comparable European airports, justifying these measures by highlighting the substantial financial needs during the construction phase of the airport, which will begin no earlier than 2030.
Government review and stakeholder consultation
The Portuguese government has acknowledged ANA’s proposal but expressed “substantial doubts” regarding the changes to airport tax models. The concessionaire, owned by the French company Vinci Group, must now consult with airlines and other stakeholders before preparing a summary report within the next six months.
The privatization of ANA without due planning will impact the economy very negatively. It is not adequate to pay highly for a known very bad infrastructure.
By Diogo F. from Lisbon on 27 Jan 2025, 14:00
If only there wasn't a new shinny airport in Beja that just needed a high speed train. But I guess it's too far in Alenejo, and so the tax payer will need to pay for yet another airport in Alcochete, that sits in...Alentejo...ANA is lucky that Portugal has a crippled rail network, but soon it'll be cheaper for many to fly from Barajas than Portela
By nunof from Lisbon on 28 Jan 2025, 17:02
This is what happens when you allow a private company control over your airports. They raise fees, period. They can pay themselves whatever they want, with no repercussions. Portugal went private, and Vinci has, through a complex conglomerate, purchased dozens of worldwide airports. Its surprising that the EU, which pretends to be anti-monopoly and has successfully fined google, msn and other companies with anti-trust lawsuits in billions of dollars has stood quietly while both consumers and airlines (like Rynair) have cried fowl.
With these increases in airport fees, I have no problem flying to spain and taking the train to my final destination. That is, until Vinci or one of its umbrella airports is bought out.
Will the EU start an investigation?
By Paul Neto from Algarve on 28 Jan 2025, 19:57